Aero

Live contract

Closed identities in aero/MEANLINE.md. Euler work is the shaft work. Do not export CFD from the old station table.

Δh0 Euler
40.42 kJ/kg
U2
201.06 m/s
C2
208.14 m/s
Cθ2
201.06 m/s
Cm2
53.86 m/s
Cθ3
0
CFD target (item 6)
Δh0 40.4 kJ/kg · dump P 13.89 MPa
PR
1.8
α2
75°
M2
0.43
75.9 kJ/kg
dead bookkeeping (η_ts×101)
61 kJ/kg
static h2−h3, mis-labeled Δh0
η_tt 0.802 / η_ts 0.75
UNSIGNED

U2 Cθ2 − U3 Cθ3 = U2² at Cθ3 = 0. With |C3| ≤ 120, extra swirl adds at most 9.05 kJ/kg → Δh0 ≤ 49.47. 75.9 is incompatible (would need Cθ3 ≈ −474 m/s). Station-derived 0.746 travels with the UNSIGNED η labels on the old 101×0.75 bookkeeping.

Frozen mixing-plane +56.5 vs Euler Δh0 40.4 — swirl-high because the 2D dump still carries swirl (C_out 266). That is a 2D-exducer miss (Japikse: exit is axial), not a 75.9 fail and not a 61 miss. 61 is the old mis-labeled static drop, not the freeze comparator. Do not recut 13 / 0.40 / Ø48 to hit 75.9. Chip 6 stays OPEN.

Named enthalpies (totals vs static)

h kJ/kg note
h00 nozzle ID ≈ 1158 P0 = 25.00 MPa, T0 = 650 C, C≈30
h02 = h00 ≈ 1158 adiabatic nozzle
h2 static rotor in ≈ 1136 ke2 = C2²/2 = 21.66
h03 ≈ 1117.6 h02 − 40.42
h3 static dump-in ≈ 1110.4 ke3 = 120²/2 = 7.20 — not 1075

ṁ is unsigned until a 3D gallery exists. 2D pitch mass is not ring ṁ.

Old table (do not export CFD from this)

Station P static (MPa) T static (°C) C (m/s) P0 (MPa) h (kJ/kg) what was wrong
1 inlet 25.0 650 30 25.00 1157.9 totals 25.00/650 — OK
2 noz TE 22.19 632 208 25.00 1136.3 static; totals OK
3 rot in 22.19 632 208 25.00 1136.3 static; totals were 25.00/650 — OK
4 rot ex 13.89 579 120 14.51 1075.0 static forced from fake Δh0=75.9
5 dump 13.89 585 40 13.96 1082.2 mixed static/total

Loss register

Term pts of Δhs
incidence1
passage8
TE2.5
tip Japikse4.8
windage1
sum17.3 pts
η_ts if sum0.827

A budget, not a CFD result and not a closed efficiency. Futral tip would be 7.6 pts, not used.

Velocity triangles

r U (m/s) C (m/s) W (m/s)
rotor inlet 24.00 mm 201.06 208.14 53.86 Cθ2 = U2 · α2 75° · M2 0.43
rotor exit 9.00 mm 75.40 120 142 Cθ3 = 0 · C3=120 labeled dump-in

Contract: Cθ3 = 0 (axial/radial dump, no swirl). Frozen C_out 266 is 2D-dump swirl, not a triangle miss.

ROSS 2.3 undamped

Foil 1e6–5e6 crosses a critical before 80k. First pair 26.4k at 1e6. Need k ≳ 5e7 for 80k. 1st pair 26.4 krpm at k=1e6, ~80 krpm at 1e7, AMB needs ≥5e7. J2 foil can ends Z=71.00, disk 72–76.

CoolProp mean-line P, T, h, and C versus stations 1 to 5
CoolProp mean-line P/T/h/C vs station, Span-Wagner CO2. NOT Fluent, NOT viscous, NOT the 20k spin.
CoolProp T-s and P-h path for stations 1 to 5
CoolProp HEOS CO2 path, stations 1→5, 25 MPa / 650 C → PR 1.8. A table walk, NOT a measured cycle.
Velocity triangles at rotor inlet and rotor exit
Velocity triangles, radial blades, Cθ2=U2, Cθ3=0. 80k labels, NOT the 20k foil spin. C3=120 labeled dump-in.
Loss register bar chart
Loss register, sum 17.3 pts, η_ts if sum 0.827. A budget, NOT a CFD result and not a closed efficiency. η_ts 0.75 / η_tt 0.802 UNSIGNED. Futral tip would be 7.6 pts — not used.
ROSS critical-speed versus journal stiffness
ROSS 2.3 undamped critical speed vs journal k, Z=72 cut, no catcher. Foil 1e6–5e6 crosses a critical before 80k. Undamped map, NOT a measured response; 80k line unsigned.